[image - black text on a blue background] “I am more reliant on personality than sex or gender to determine whether or not I am interested in someone. But I don’t like the term “Pansexual”. As a grammar freak, I hate how the term mixes Greek and English (It should be panphilic). As a definition, I do not believe it defines me. ”Pansexual” simply means all-loving, not limiting it to humans. While I find nothing wrong with this, I do not believe it applies to me. I have felt the need for a new term to describe me. So, Homo c. [a human being, man, mortal] Amo [to love (passionately), to be fond of] Amo-homo - To love humans. Even if the grammar is incorrect, I’m satisfied with the basic idea.
-
belle-frost reblogged this from queersecrets
-
hormonal-teenager reblogged this from queersecrets
-
magnushammerass reblogged this from queersecrets and added:
This is actually a good way of putting it. :D
-
derangedlazyartist reblogged this from queersecrets
-
stygiandawn likes this
-
sapphicfaery likes this
-
agentcharlton reblogged this from lifetimeofashes and added:
lol, freak.
-
lifetimeofashes reblogged this from rainbowsndreadlocks
-
rainbowsndreadlocks reblogged this from queersecrets
-
ifibelievedingod reblogged this from queersecrets
-
kylev2-0 likes this
-
batpants112 likes this
-
marissalyn31 likes this
-
nightwalker4769 likes this
-
sweetwhiskeypress likes this
-
nonotlikethesinger likes this
-
abitofanoddball reblogged this from queersecrets and added:
I agree with the first paragraph but not so much the use of whomever’s made-up term. Hm.
-
mischievouslovegood reblogged this from queersecrets
-
asidissolve likes this
-
productofabrokenworld reblogged this from ladyunlaced
-
roserobert likes this
-
austrynthompson likes this
-
randominternetcitizen likes this
-
telracsgomesu reblogged this from queersecrets
-
upsofloatingmanybellsdown likes this
-
reynapunani reblogged this from queersecrets and added:
FINALLY
-
canadianchibivampyre likes this
-
kingmarshallee reblogged this from queersecrets
-
eccentriclgbtweirdo reblogged this from queersecrets
-
caitlinmarissa likes this
-
eclecticwiccan likes this
-
trotz59 reblogged this from queersecrets
-
summmitt likes this
-
lilyisanadult reblogged this from ladyunlaced
-
on-the-fringe-of-lunacy reblogged this from missbriannalee and added:
I like this. I really do.
-
lessrediculous likes this
-
ladyunlaced reblogged this from resplandecen
-
atracaelum likes this
-
jacobenimble reblogged this from queersecrets
-
jacobenimble likes this
-
stephanie-le-slutau likes this
-
batmonica likes this
-
nvrtakelifetooseriously reblogged this from queersecrets and added:
Close.
-
sleepwalkinginlife likes this
-
theadventuresofsidandlewis likes this
-
hellcas likes this
-
whizzledizzle likes this
-
borntofollow likes this
- Show more notes
![[image - black text on a blue background] “I am more reliant on personality than sex or gender to determine whether or not I am interested in someone. But I don’t like the term “Pansexual”. As a grammar freak, I hate how the term mixes Greek and English (It should be panphilic). As a definition, I do not believe it defines me. ”Pansexual” simply means all-loving, not limiting it to humans. While I find nothing wrong with this, I do not believe it applies to me. I have felt the need for a new term to describe me. So, Homo c. [a human being, man, mortal] Amo [to love (passionately), to be fond of] Amo-homo - To love humans. Even if the grammar is incorrect, I’m satisfied with the basic idea.](http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m2p3gv8Kgc1qcpj7wo1_500.jpg)